<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Single Founder</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.singlefounder.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.singlefounder.com</link>
	<description>Musings on software and startups from a single founder</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 05:02:10 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on The Builder and the Salesman by The Marketer and the Developer &#124; TEDS.ME</title>
		<link>http://www.singlefounder.com/2010/03/09/the-builder-and-the-salesman/comment-page-1/#comment-1658</link>
		<dc:creator>The Marketer and the Developer &#124; TEDS.ME</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 05:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.singlefounder.com/?p=597#comment-1658</guid>
		<description>[...] The openness from those with experience is what makes the startup community online so awesome. Pricing strategy and Crazy Egg Case Study [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The openness from those with experience is what makes the startup community online so awesome. Pricing strategy and Crazy Egg Case Study [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Builder and the Salesman by TED</title>
		<link>http://www.singlefounder.com/2010/03/09/the-builder-and-the-salesman/comment-page-1/#comment-1657</link>
		<dc:creator>TED</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 04:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.singlefounder.com/?p=597#comment-1657</guid>
		<description>So then you will agreed that in most situations the chance for success is much greater with one awesome builder and one awesome marketer.

You don&#039;t bring a salesman into the game until you have a scalable business where you can put in one dollar of marketing and get a positive ROI on your ad spend.

A good marketer can make something valuable out of thin air just like a great developer creates value out of lines of code. The marketer and the developer are climbing up opposite sides of the same mountain. A good marketer can reposition an entire industry. A good marketer can make an entirely new economic ecosystem. Marketing is the engine that drives commerce. Just like there are hundreds of different coding languages there are hundreds of subsets of marketing disciplines. Marketing strategies like SEO, PCC, SEM, copy and direct sales etc. etc. The rabbit hole goes pretty deep. At some point you have to stop reading all of the books and blogs on 10 ways to do X and actually make something happen in the world.

Mike you have some really great insight and experience and I appreciate your openness and honesty. The openness from those with experience is what makes the startup community online so awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So then you will agreed that in most situations the chance for success is much greater with one awesome builder and one awesome marketer.</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t bring a salesman into the game until you have a scalable business where you can put in one dollar of marketing and get a positive ROI on your ad spend.</p>
<p>A good marketer can make something valuable out of thin air just like a great developer creates value out of lines of code. The marketer and the developer are climbing up opposite sides of the same mountain. A good marketer can reposition an entire industry. A good marketer can make an entirely new economic ecosystem. Marketing is the engine that drives commerce. Just like there are hundreds of different coding languages there are hundreds of subsets of marketing disciplines. Marketing strategies like SEO, PCC, SEM, copy and direct sales etc. etc. The rabbit hole goes pretty deep. At some point you have to stop reading all of the books and blogs on 10 ways to do X and actually make something happen in the world.</p>
<p>Mike you have some really great insight and experience and I appreciate your openness and honesty. The openness from those with experience is what makes the startup community online so awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stupid Reasons to Start a Software Company by Mike Taber</title>
		<link>http://www.singlefounder.com/2010/04/20/second-podcast-episode/comment-page-1/#comment-1653</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Taber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 20:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.singlefounder.com/?p=687#comment-1653</guid>
		<description>http://www.startupsfortherestofus.com/episodes/episode-2-stupid-reasons-to-start-a-software-company

Will, above is the URL. All of our podcast transcripts are located on the main podcast website. Just find the episode and then click on &quot;Read More&quot;. We dont offer them in anything other than HTML from. The site, but you could copy/paste it into a document if you wanted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.startupsfortherestofus.com/episodes/episode-2-stupid-reasons-to-start-a-software-company" rel="nofollow">http://www.startupsfortherestofus.com/episodes/episode-2-stupid-reasons-to-start-a-software-company</a></p>
<p>Will, above is the URL. All of our podcast transcripts are located on the main podcast website. Just find the episode and then click on &#8220;Read More&#8221;. We dont offer them in anything other than HTML from. The site, but you could copy/paste it into a document if you wanted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stupid Reasons to Start a Software Company by Will Rayer</title>
		<link>http://www.singlefounder.com/2010/04/20/second-podcast-episode/comment-page-1/#comment-1652</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Rayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 17:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.singlefounder.com/?p=687#comment-1652</guid>
		<description>Hi there - I&#039;m trying to find the written transcript of your podcast &quot;Stupid Reasons to Start a Software Company&quot;. Can you give me a link?

Kind regards, Will Rayer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there &#8211; I&#8217;m trying to find the written transcript of your podcast &#8220;Stupid Reasons to Start a Software Company&#8221;. Can you give me a link?</p>
<p>Kind regards, Will Rayer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Widescreen Laptop Conspiracy by Brendan</title>
		<link>http://www.singlefounder.com/2007/04/04/widescreenlaptopconspiracy/comment-page-2/#comment-1639</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 12:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miketaber.net/archive/2007/04/04/WidescreenLaptopConspiracy.aspx#comment-1639</guid>
		<description>Once upon a time, industrial requirements led demand for computing hardware. The manufacturers therefore had to develop and build to specifications that met industrial requirements.

Then along came consumerism and the age-old numbers game and sound-bites to woo a technically-inept public. Processors had to be faster, despite everything else on their systems being slow and imbalanced, so gamers could preen their feathers based on how many big numbers they could quote. Along comes a new processor and you have to buy one to maintain respect amongst your peers. Same thing with hard-drive capacity, irrespective of speed, cache, or seek times for given applications, and so on.

Now we have the &quot;Widescreen&quot; must-haves, marketed  to Joe Public sold on being able to watch widescreen movies on his/her PC - irrespective of the fact he could watch them anyway. But it does reduce real-estate for the manufacturers and therefore reduces cost, EVEN THOUGH the old 4:3 aspect ratio was originally chosen as the optimal format for motion viewing! But heh, &quot; I can watch wide-screen films just like the cinema, on my PC&quot; (LOL).

This kind of marketing crap to the ignorants is going on everywhere now, to the point that suppliers and service providers can easily dictate terms, for their own advantage, to the overwhelmingly Ignorant, dumbed-down masses. It&#039;s not about what WE really want any more, it&#039;s whether it can maximise profit and sales by differentiation and sound-bites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once upon a time, industrial requirements led demand for computing hardware. The manufacturers therefore had to develop and build to specifications that met industrial requirements.</p>
<p>Then along came consumerism and the age-old numbers game and sound-bites to woo a technically-inept public. Processors had to be faster, despite everything else on their systems being slow and imbalanced, so gamers could preen their feathers based on how many big numbers they could quote. Along comes a new processor and you have to buy one to maintain respect amongst your peers. Same thing with hard-drive capacity, irrespective of speed, cache, or seek times for given applications, and so on.</p>
<p>Now we have the &#8220;Widescreen&#8221; must-haves, marketed  to Joe Public sold on being able to watch widescreen movies on his/her PC &#8211; irrespective of the fact he could watch them anyway. But it does reduce real-estate for the manufacturers and therefore reduces cost, EVEN THOUGH the old 4:3 aspect ratio was originally chosen as the optimal format for motion viewing! But heh, &#8221; I can watch wide-screen films just like the cinema, on my PC&#8221; (LOL).</p>
<p>This kind of marketing crap to the ignorants is going on everywhere now, to the point that suppliers and service providers can easily dictate terms, for their own advantage, to the overwhelmingly Ignorant, dumbed-down masses. It&#8217;s not about what WE really want any more, it&#8217;s whether it can maximise profit and sales by differentiation and sound-bites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Widescreen Laptop Conspiracy by Mike Taber</title>
		<link>http://www.singlefounder.com/2007/04/04/widescreenlaptopconspiracy/comment-page-2/#comment-1631</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Taber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 02:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miketaber.net/archive/2007/04/04/WidescreenLaptopConspiracy.aspx#comment-1631</guid>
		<description>The only one that I&#039;m aware of is the Panasonic Toughbook, which has a 1600x1200 screen. Your best bet is to find an &quot;off-brand&quot;, as most of the major manufacturers have simply stopped selling them.

This would be a prime opportunity for a small manufacturer to start building them again. Wouldn&#039;t have to have many options, but they could charge a premium. The issue I think is that the LCD manufacturers simply don&#039;t make them anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only one that I&#8217;m aware of is the Panasonic Toughbook, which has a 1600&#215;1200 screen. Your best bet is to find an &#8220;off-brand&#8221;, as most of the major manufacturers have simply stopped selling them.</p>
<p>This would be a prime opportunity for a small manufacturer to start building them again. Wouldn&#8217;t have to have many options, but they could charge a premium. The issue I think is that the LCD manufacturers simply don&#8217;t make them anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Widescreen Laptop Conspiracy by Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.singlefounder.com/2007/04/04/widescreenlaptopconspiracy/comment-page-2/#comment-1630</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 02:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miketaber.net/archive/2007/04/04/WidescreenLaptopConspiracy.aspx#comment-1630</guid>
		<description>Today I went to Best Buy looking for a laptop. Widescreens as far as the eye could see. It&#039;s terrible. It&#039;s hard on the eyes and I felt like I was straining myself in the few minutes that I was there. Does anyone know a link to a place where they still sell non-widescreens?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today I went to Best Buy looking for a laptop. Widescreens as far as the eye could see. It&#8217;s terrible. It&#8217;s hard on the eyes and I felt like I was straining myself in the few minutes that I was there. Does anyone know a link to a place where they still sell non-widescreens?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Widescreen Laptop Conspiracy by Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.singlefounder.com/2007/04/04/widescreenlaptopconspiracy/comment-page-2/#comment-1629</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 05:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miketaber.net/archive/2007/04/04/WidescreenLaptopConspiracy.aspx#comment-1629</guid>
		<description>Heah, heah!... it&#039;s not just laptops though... I manage a school site where we wanted to replace our older 17&quot; LCD screens. To get anywhere even close to a similar vertical size; not a bad idea when you are doing lots of wordprocessing, or for that matter Photoshop! we struggled. We found that Philips produce what is now termed &quot;business&quot; screens in good old 4:3, but of course they don&#039;t have speakers, which is just as stupid; do business people not use sound?  In the end we have had to go to a 22&quot; model in widescreen... though even that is less visible lines than we enjoyed before. There has also been a change in the larger 24&quot; models; the one I currently use is 1920x1200, which isn&#039;t too bad, but that model is no longer available and the latest models are now 1920x1080... no doubt another big cost saving...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heah, heah!&#8230; it&#8217;s not just laptops though&#8230; I manage a school site where we wanted to replace our older 17&#8243; LCD screens. To get anywhere even close to a similar vertical size; not a bad idea when you are doing lots of wordprocessing, or for that matter Photoshop! we struggled. We found that Philips produce what is now termed &#8220;business&#8221; screens in good old 4:3, but of course they don&#8217;t have speakers, which is just as stupid; do business people not use sound?  In the end we have had to go to a 22&#8243; model in widescreen&#8230; though even that is less visible lines than we enjoyed before. There has also been a change in the larger 24&#8243; models; the one I currently use is 1920&#215;1200, which isn&#8217;t too bad, but that model is no longer available and the latest models are now 1920&#215;1080&#8230; no doubt another big cost saving&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tips on negotiating a great consulting rate by Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.singlefounder.com/2009/10/12/tips-on-negotiating-a-great-consulting-rate/comment-page-1/#comment-1628</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 16:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.miketaber.net/?p=283#comment-1628</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the informative response.  I failed to mention that they paid for some client-requested training, based on my agreement to repay them if I didn&#039;t stay 6 months after the training.  I know.  Bad move on my part.  I&#039;m learning the hard way, here...  

I will have to wait until July to ask for the raise in order to actually have the leverage of possibly leaving.  I&#039;m not sure I could stick to my principles and be willing to pay back the $3k for leaving before the 6 months are up.

Thanks again, Mike.  Your insight and openness have been invaluable to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the informative response.  I failed to mention that they paid for some client-requested training, based on my agreement to repay them if I didn&#8217;t stay 6 months after the training.  I know.  Bad move on my part.  I&#8217;m learning the hard way, here&#8230;  </p>
<p>I will have to wait until July to ask for the raise in order to actually have the leverage of possibly leaving.  I&#8217;m not sure I could stick to my principles and be willing to pay back the $3k for leaving before the 6 months are up.</p>
<p>Thanks again, Mike.  Your insight and openness have been invaluable to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tips on negotiating a great consulting rate by Mike Taber</title>
		<link>http://www.singlefounder.com/2009/10/12/tips-on-negotiating-a-great-consulting-rate/comment-page-1/#comment-1626</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Taber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 23:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.miketaber.net/?p=283#comment-1626</guid>
		<description>Personally, I wouldn&#039;t wait. I&#039;d use this as an opportunity to say &quot;Hey, if the client finds me to be so valuable, then I think I deserve a raise for sticking around through December because nobody consulted with me about whether or not I even wanted to stay.&quot;

If you don&#039;t address the situation now, you&#039;re going to be a less than stellar employee for the next 6 months and feel as though you&#039;ve been taken advantage of for the entire time.

I would come up with some solid facts about why you deserve the raise. Cite things like your work ethic, the fact that you&#039;re a known quantity now, as opposed to a risk of hiring someone new, etc. Obviously, having another job opportunity certainly gives you additional leverage.

But I think I&#039;d definitely bring up the fact that you hadn&#039;t taken into consideration the additional expenses of SE Taxes, medical insurance, etc. As an independent contractor, generally you should be able to walk whenever you feel like it. Make sure you have a definitive number in mind when you ask and just say &quot;$36/hour would make me happy.&quot;

If they do it (and I suspect that they will), then great. If not, find something else. You&#039;re not doing yourself any favors by sticking around.

As a last ditch effort, you could simply ask the customer if they would consider hiring you full time. Typically, with contract agencies, there&#039;s a policy in place that states the customer is required to pay $X if they hire a contract worker directly. Sometimes it&#039;s a fixed dollar amount, other times it&#039;s based on the rate, and occasionally it&#039;s based on the cost of finding a replacement. However, it might be barred completely.

Given the discrepancy between what your salary is and what the contract agency is making from you, it might be worth it for the customer to break that contract and hire you directly. They&#039;re not likely aware that you&#039;re being paid so little, and if they were, they probably don&#039;t realize that you&#039;re paying your employment and medical insurance yourself.

The numbers you threw out (at least to me) seem too far out of whack to justify. Someone is making a killing and for you to ask for an extra $6/hour is very little for a sales rep to give up as opposed to going completely without while they find a replacement, and then risking the inability to find someone the customer likes at a similar price as what you are being paid.

It&#039;s not unusual to pay 2X salary for a consultant. What is unusual is to pay 2X salary for an independent contractor for a 6 month basis. Really, it should only be 1.5x at the most because the money and income is basically guaranteed to the agency.

I think if I were the customer, I&#039;d be really upset if I learned I was paying 2x what the person working for me actually costs. There&#039;s something to be said from their standpoint for flexibility on a short term basis, but for a lengthy contract, that&#039;s just not right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I wouldn&#8217;t wait. I&#8217;d use this as an opportunity to say &#8220;Hey, if the client finds me to be so valuable, then I think I deserve a raise for sticking around through December because nobody consulted with me about whether or not I even wanted to stay.&#8221;</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t address the situation now, you&#8217;re going to be a less than stellar employee for the next 6 months and feel as though you&#8217;ve been taken advantage of for the entire time.</p>
<p>I would come up with some solid facts about why you deserve the raise. Cite things like your work ethic, the fact that you&#8217;re a known quantity now, as opposed to a risk of hiring someone new, etc. Obviously, having another job opportunity certainly gives you additional leverage.</p>
<p>But I think I&#8217;d definitely bring up the fact that you hadn&#8217;t taken into consideration the additional expenses of SE Taxes, medical insurance, etc. As an independent contractor, generally you should be able to walk whenever you feel like it. Make sure you have a definitive number in mind when you ask and just say &#8220;$36/hour would make me happy.&#8221;</p>
<p>If they do it (and I suspect that they will), then great. If not, find something else. You&#8217;re not doing yourself any favors by sticking around.</p>
<p>As a last ditch effort, you could simply ask the customer if they would consider hiring you full time. Typically, with contract agencies, there&#8217;s a policy in place that states the customer is required to pay $X if they hire a contract worker directly. Sometimes it&#8217;s a fixed dollar amount, other times it&#8217;s based on the rate, and occasionally it&#8217;s based on the cost of finding a replacement. However, it might be barred completely.</p>
<p>Given the discrepancy between what your salary is and what the contract agency is making from you, it might be worth it for the customer to break that contract and hire you directly. They&#8217;re not likely aware that you&#8217;re being paid so little, and if they were, they probably don&#8217;t realize that you&#8217;re paying your employment and medical insurance yourself.</p>
<p>The numbers you threw out (at least to me) seem too far out of whack to justify. Someone is making a killing and for you to ask for an extra $6/hour is very little for a sales rep to give up as opposed to going completely without while they find a replacement, and then risking the inability to find someone the customer likes at a similar price as what you are being paid.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not unusual to pay 2X salary for a consultant. What is unusual is to pay 2X salary for an independent contractor for a 6 month basis. Really, it should only be 1.5x at the most because the money and income is basically guaranteed to the agency.</p>
<p>I think if I were the customer, I&#8217;d be really upset if I learned I was paying 2x what the person working for me actually costs. There&#8217;s something to be said from their standpoint for flexibility on a short term basis, but for a lengthy contract, that&#8217;s just not right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
